Ethics would be said to be about the validity of Existent Entities, and Morality about the validity of creating change to said entities. Ethics would-be about and-of as-is, and Morality as objective-based would-be about and-of change.
Ethics is considered sphere the
Positive Dimension as the Whole and All, while Morality is considered of the compass of the
Negative Dimension as memory and mind, or conceptional objectives, the Part and One.
There are three kinds of change as : Inherent, human-anomaly and spiritual intercession. Change inherent in any given
Existent Entity is generally valid as construct-makeup. The sun rises and the sun sets as the given condition.
Existent Determination is the Conservative determinant that explains all natural change as promoting the preservation of the pre-existent state changed in a same or similar state and condition. As its nature Ethics would be in conformance.
Ethics concerns the proper and correct conduct directed as befits and benefits any given subject or entity, even to the disadvantage of the Ethiteer. As Mark Twain once posed as a newly appointed paper's editor, I will be as truthful as I can up to the point where the truth would land me in jail. Not that great a disadvantage.
The evaluative system of the Conservative Paradigm is called
Optimum Correspondence, which means a single
Comparative Base, as the optimum condition of any given entity, wherein value is assessed by degrees as more or less than optimum. The optimum amount or rain for
grape-growing is fixed, each year evaluated as something more or something less. The Comparative Base is fixed by the construct of any given entities composition, as a degree of optimum temperature, optimum amount of food and sleep or exercise. The optimum is not always a matter of determined by type, grade or species but often is individual.
Conservative Paradigm (3 of 10)