1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

Symbolic Logic is essentially the creation of Interpretive Context, as a perspective in which to interpret the reality of ordinary circumstance and events, as what happens or the content as the structure of what one percieves. It is a logic that assumes that either some spiritual force intercedes in circumstance as communication, or that given this kind of Interpretive Context, things are taken for communication that would have happened anyway by mundane causes, but would otherwise go unnoticed and unheeded. Symbolic Logic means that specific circumstance, events, phenomenon, or physical structure, may be interpreted to possess meaning, intellegent design and intent. An Interpretive Context could be a question, a statement, an assumed identity, an assumed place or location, assumed consequence, or events distinct by individuality or rareness of occurence. The actual and real reason for signs and symbolic events or circumstance is suspended. What happens is compared to context the individual has created. Thus if the individual asks the question, 'What is the nature of evil?', that is the creation of an Interpretive Context. When something in reality occurs that seems to relate, sheds light or answers the the question, that instance of reality can be interpreted as communication. However if there is a correlation between creating context and reality, one must be careful what they ask for.

In terms of the emotional make-up, the Conservative is not wedded to a consequential value system that is based on bipolar opposites, with an accordant love/hate dichotomy, wherein emotion is governed by assoications, as what is and is not of consequence. The sensory make-up of the Conservative is said to be governed by what is termed Natural Affection. This means that the sensory system is not so much affected by associations containing consequential value, as it is by direct sensation, as experienced by the sensory system. If everything is considered to be more or less of equal consequence, then the sensory response will tend to accord to the actual sensory condition, as opposed to being modified by the associaltion of consequential value. The absence of a dualistic value system is the absence of a polarized sensory response system.