This determination by any given individual, represents the true Consequence of Being of states and entities by virtue of what is done as opposed to what is said or thought. This difference described as the Ethical and Volitional Division, is a further spit of the Bipolar Divergence in which ethical conduct corresponds to the premises of what has been defined as conservative and spiritual, while the emphasis on volitional capacity equates to what has been described as progressive and material. Ethics represents standards for human conduct when pre-existent states or conditions are determined to be of greater value and consequence than alternatives created to them, and thus is based on prohibitions and limitations. Morality represents standards of conduct when alternative states are of greater consequence than what they replace, and thus is based upon the promotion of the abilities of volition.
Ethics is defined here as the codes of conduct for human activity and
behavior which derive from essentially a Proto-religious determination. What gives to nature its validity of existence is its spiritual content, wherein spiritual presence and manifestation is considered as inherent, in any of all aspects of the natural planet and or the Given Existence. Ethics represents standards of human conduct wherein pre-existent states or conditions of the natural world, are determined to possess a legitimacy of existence, which is of greater value and consequence than alternatives that can be created to them. Thus ethics is prohibitive, which is to say alteration of things pre-existent is prohibited or limited.
The validity of spiritual existence is either a matter of faith, wherein spiritual entities are other dimensional and cannot be validated by the human sensory apparatus, or wherein spiritual validity may be established by sensory substantiation, which is described by the concept of Spiritual Manifestations.
OVERVIEW (12 OF 22)