If there is no consequence inherent in the natural world, it must be conceptual in origin or actuality. This conception of a validity of existence, is considered to be the opposite of what is natural, or as ideal and perfection. The poles created between what is natural and the ideals of perfection, produces the system of evaluation termed the Dyadic Authoritative Comparative. This system represents degrees of evaluation between opposed poles as the
Antithetical Matrix which represents what is natural, and the Metaphysical Ideal
or Extra Mundane Authority which represents progressed states as Qualified of Extra Mundane.
DYADIC MORAL OBLIGATION
Morality as systems of instruction for how things may be treated, derives
from the use of the Dyadic Authoritative Comparative, as a vehicle for the assessment of value and consequence. In terms of the human relations,
people can be classified as something between natural or native, to the
completely progressed, educated and sophisticated. The Dyadic Moral
Obligation is the Authoritative Imperative of human relations and
represents models and standards, as Metaphysical Ideals and Extra Mundane Authorities, to which human activity, behavior, conduct and conditions should correspond. The individual does not freely interpret and self-decide upon the standards of moral conduct, but should correspond activity, behavior and conduct to the models of moral ideals, as established outside the self, by
various institutions of family, culture, religion or politics. Because the individual
is required to correspond to standards created by others, which are enforced by pressures of various sorts, such as force and confinement, they are considered as obligated and authoritative.
Morality as codes of human conduct originate with the introduction or adoption
of Excess and Profit, wherein pre-existent states contain no inherent value and consequence in and of themselves, but require for a determination of value and consequence, a comparison based upon a correspondence to authorities which are conceptual in actuality or in origin, and thus are subjective and relative mechanisms. Human nature may be considered as having no inherent consequence in and of itself.
OVERVIEW (14 OF 19)